Light hearted - thats me. My boss does nothing else but complain that I do not take things seriously enought.
Problem is that us "annoymous" fellows are representative of a small group - depending on who is "on duty" on a particular day (the site is run by us volunteer project planners), will depend on the opinion you get.
Ironic really, and you do have a point, as I suppose we too are anonymous posters - several people inadvertently taking on a "single" persona.
Worth thinking about.
I am not too concerned over the "keep em" or loose em" approach to Guest posters. Its James who does the scripting, so it will only mean more work for him!! (Sorry James!) - all I have to do is type!
Darrell, thanks for your opinions. Free speech!!
Member for
23 years 8 months
Member for23 years8 months
Submitted by Darrell ODea on Fri, 2003-07-18 11:19
No offence meant, but its D-a-r-r-e-l-l. Mr. (Annoymous) Moderator.
Perhaps we should all start to paraphrase "great" or made up sayings. As some of the greatest philosophical thoughts are and were had by anonymous people.
All the best.
ps. Do what U want, you have the "Power"......... to delete people.
or maybe we should all remain a little more light hearted ?????
If "the moderator(s)" are taking the stance? That only members may view/apply/get the jobs advertised. Are we not in danger of loosing the challenging views that other non-memers or those who prefer to not-disclose their ID. After all I am sure that perhaps, it is a challenge to say what you really think when your name is tagged to the statement.
Privacy is an absolute "Right" as far as I am concerned. And should remain so for us all, including those not wishing to become members of a quasi open chat forum.
So there.
Member for
22 years 3 months
Member for22 years3 months
Submitted by Raju Shahani on Fri, 2003-07-18 09:30
One of the way to make the site more popular is that every one should be able to apply for the job, i am sure if any one gets job from the Planning planet, he would not only register himself at the site but would be live advertisement for the site !!!
Member for
22 years 9 months
Member for22 years10 months
Submitted by Ronald Winter on Mon, 2003-05-19 17:23
Requiring that the person first identify themselves seems a reasonable requirement. Without this requirement, it would be possible to shut others out by flooding an opening with bogus submittals. It would take much longer for someone to try to do this with members only.
Member for
23 years 8 monthsWell said
Well said Mehdi.....
Author Message
Mehdi Rashidi Alangeh
( 3,615 )
Member since Jul 2003
Iran
11 Posts Re: The Best NEW Job
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we should allow anyone use the job offers in order to Develop of project management segment in the world.
Regards
M.Rashidi
Member for
22 years 3 monthsRe: The Best NEW Job
I think we should allow anyone use the job offers in order to Develop of project management segment in the world.
Regards
M.Rashidi
Member for
16 years 9 monthsRE: RE: Planning Planet Membership
Darrell, (I checked that - sorry)
Light hearted - thats me. My boss does nothing else but complain that I do not take things seriously enought.
Problem is that us "annoymous" fellows are representative of a small group - depending on who is "on duty" on a particular day (the site is run by us volunteer project planners), will depend on the opinion you get.
Ironic really, and you do have a point, as I suppose we too are anonymous posters - several people inadvertently taking on a "single" persona.
Worth thinking about.
I am not too concerned over the "keep em" or loose em" approach to Guest posters. Its James who does the scripting, so it will only mean more work for him!! (Sorry James!) - all I have to do is type!
Darrell, thanks for your opinions. Free speech!!
Member for
23 years 8 monthsRE: Planning Planet Membership
Personally I would prefer if you did not.
No offence meant, but its D-a-r-r-e-l-l. Mr. (Annoymous) Moderator.
Perhaps we should all start to paraphrase "great" or made up sayings. As some of the greatest philosophical thoughts are and were had by anonymous people.
All the best.
ps. Do what U want, you have the "Power"......... to delete people.
or maybe we should all remain a little more light hearted ?????
ps.ps. Respek....
Member for
16 years 9 monthsRE: Planning Planet Membership
Daryl,
As usual, your a man not afraid to mince his words. Power to you buddy ! (not that anyone is considered to be 100% correct)
Power, and its associated strength can often come from those who are willing, (especially) to put their name to their opinions!
Hey, I do not have all of the answers, but respect your valid view point.
Should we turn off the guest forum post facility?
Member for
23 years 8 monthsRE: RE: Planning Planet Membership
If "the moderator(s)" are taking the stance? That only members may view/apply/get the jobs advertised. Are we not in danger of loosing the challenging views that other non-memers or those who prefer to not-disclose their ID. After all I am sure that perhaps, it is a challenge to say what you really think when your name is tagged to the statement.
Privacy is an absolute "Right" as far as I am concerned. And should remain so for us all, including those not wishing to become members of a quasi open chat forum.
So there.
Member for
22 years 3 monthsRE: Planning Planet Membership
One of the way to make the site more popular is that every one should be able to apply for the job, i am sure if any one gets job from the Planning planet, he would not only register himself at the site but would be live advertisement for the site !!!
Member for
22 years 9 monthsPlanning Planet Membership
W.C. Fields once said, "Id never join a club that would have me as a member." Perhaps W.C. was part Australian.
Member for
16 years 9 monthsRE: RE: RE: RE: The Best NEW Job
Really it should only be members. Keep out the riff raff thats what I say !!
Anyway, this is a web site for "planners" isnt it?
Member for
23 years 8 monthsRE: RE: RE: The Best NEW Job
Allow anyone, if the Agents and Employers are doing their jobs, they will pick the right person anyhow.
Within the current membership, their may not be an individual that fullfills an employers criteria.
Member for
24 years 4 monthsRE: RE: The Best NEW Job
I agree, it should be service open to members only. Afetr all, joining isnt difficult !
Member for
22 years 9 monthsRE: The Best NEW Job
Requiring that the person first identify themselves seems a reasonable requirement. Without this requirement, it would be possible to shut others out by flooding an opening with bogus submittals. It would take much longer for someone to try to do this with members only.