Planners,
As someone who is always on the lookout to explore new planning ground, I’m hoping to build on David Bordoli’s post in
this thread (and a number of other threads after doing a little forum searching).
I have a question about ADePT (Analytical Design Planning Technique) more specifically what are the differences between ADePT and Agile?
I’m more familiar with Agile development and as far as I can tell they both seem to promote incremental and iterative development over the traditional waterfall approach.
However, whereas Agile focuses on short, sharp timeboxed deliverables and is extremely adaptable when requirements change at any time during the project lifecycle, ADePT is aimed at the development and design phases and after this is complete traditional planning takes over. Is this correct?
So apart from the obvious IT vs construction and lifecycle vs phase, are there any other particularities that set them apart?
Regards,
Darren
Replies