Carmen has given regional PP membership figures. I guess it would be a good start to move on with this regional discussion idea. Of course, it would not mean leaving the main threads as it was but simply reducing some threads which are of regional concern that is now planned to be contained in one section.
This is in addition to what I have posted in Location:UAE.
Fully agree with you regarding the opening of Malaysia forum, WHY Malaysia and no China.
Working with PP figures regarding PP pool of worldwide planners, I got the following :
PP worldwide members distribution :
Europe: 9821 planners
S. America: 343
N. America: 3158
M. East : 4493
Asia : 10269
South Asia : 2634
If we would like to break up the forum by locations, let’s use the split shown above. The regions mentioned above represent economic systems. Capital investment projects are strongly linked to the economic performance of the region.
The best example of this is the actual financial crisis and its effect on slowing down or stopping projects .
Regarding the dating option, I think that it would be a proposal without success here.
RE: Location: Malaysia
Hi Shahzad,
I agree with you completely.
Chris Oggham
RE: Location: Malaysia
If the forum continues as it is rather than its regional splitting, I think it will be better.
RE: Location: Malaysia
Carmen has given regional PP membership figures. I guess it would be a good start to move on with this regional discussion idea. Of course, it would not mean leaving the main threads as it was but simply reducing some threads which are of regional concern that is now planned to be contained in one section.
This is in addition to what I have posted in Location:UAE.
I see nothing wrong with this idea.
Cheers!
Happy Planning and Scheduling
RE: Location: Malaysia
There is something diabolical with that main thread Location Malaysia, because it was not deleted
It was supposed to be a trial or test, but some copycat maybe with IT expertise also generated this main thread Location: Malaysia.
This should stop for the same reason I mention in Location: UAE.
Can your imagine if our beloved forum will be bombarded by such nice but irrelevant topics as main thread????
Location: Philippinest
Location: Hong Kong
Location: Chile,
Location: Paco (Paco is a small district in Manila, National Capital Region, Philippines)
Location: San Diego, USA
Location: Yellowstone Park, California, USA
Pls, pls we will put a stop on this. this is totally irrelevant as main thread,
Maybe as sub-thread to a main thread
RE: Location: Malaysia
Joel,
Fully agree with you regarding the opening of Malaysia forum, WHY Malaysia and no China.
Working with PP figures regarding PP pool of worldwide planners, I got the following :
PP worldwide members distribution :
Europe: 9821 planners
S. America: 343
N. America: 3158
M. East : 4493
Asia : 10269
South Asia : 2634
If we would like to break up the forum by locations, let’s use the split shown above. The regions mentioned above represent economic systems. Capital investment projects are strongly linked to the economic performance of the region.
The best example of this is the actual financial crisis and its effect on slowing down or stopping projects .
Regarding the dating option, I think that it would be a proposal without success here.
Cheers,