My definition of Impacted as Planned method of delay analysis is where a delay event occurs during the progress of the work and the duration of the delay event is impacted on to the affected activity - thus showing the likely effect of the delay on the completion date.
If you agree with this then it is the ONLY method that can be used when work is in progress.
The critical path will change after the impact of the event ONLY if the event uses up enough total float to affect criticality.
It should NEVER be used for forensic delay analysis when work is completed.
I have no idea what you mean by Time Interval analysis unless you are referring to Windows or Snapshot methods which - outside of USA - are totally debunked as valid delay analysis procedures.
Member for
14 years 9 monthsHi Mike: i modify it .Thanks
Hi Mike:
i modify it .
Thanks , please open this link to book for other related.
http://ebookee.org/Delay-Analysis-in-Construction-Contracts_349469.html
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi Khalid Let us get our
Hi Khalid
Let us get our terms right first.
My definition of Impacted as Planned method of delay analysis is where a delay event occurs during the progress of the work and the duration of the delay event is impacted on to the affected activity - thus showing the likely effect of the delay on the completion date.
If you agree with this then it is the ONLY method that can be used when work is in progress.
The critical path will change after the impact of the event ONLY if the event uses up enough total float to affect criticality.
It should NEVER be used for forensic delay analysis when work is completed.
I have no idea what you mean by Time Interval analysis unless you are referring to Windows or Snapshot methods which - outside of USA - are totally debunked as valid delay analysis procedures.
Best regards
Mike Testro