Forensic Claims Analysis Member for 20 years 3 months Member for 20 years 3 months Submitted by Charleston-Jos… on Tue, 2009-03-17 05:18 Permalink RE: Recommended Reading: SCL Paper D95 - David Barry I read the paper long time ago. It is not championing Mikes belove and simplistic "Impacted as-planned Analysis Method". Mike what can you say when one of your brethen have this opnion that Impacted as Planned is not really "... the Method Recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol". in fact the paper stated "... time impact analysis method ... is the method recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol. cheers, Charlie Log in or register to post comments
Member for 20 years 3 months Member for 20 years 3 months Submitted by Charleston-Jos… on Tue, 2009-03-17 05:18 Permalink RE: Recommended Reading: SCL Paper D95 - David Barry I read the paper long time ago. It is not championing Mikes belove and simplistic "Impacted as-planned Analysis Method". Mike what can you say when one of your brethen have this opnion that Impacted as Planned is not really "... the Method Recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol". in fact the paper stated "... time impact analysis method ... is the method recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol. cheers, Charlie
Member for
20 years 3 monthsRE: Recommended Reading: SCL Paper D95 - David Barry
I read the paper long time ago.
It is not championing Mikes belove and simplistic "Impacted as-planned Analysis Method".
Mike what can you say when one of your brethen have this opnion that Impacted as Planned is not really
"... the Method Recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol".
in fact the paper stated "... time impact analysis method ... is the method recommended by the SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol.
cheers,
Charlie