Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Delay Analysis using Impacted As Planned Method

2 replies [Last post]
Prageeth Chandrasiri
User offline. Last seen 6 years 33 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6 Jul 2011
Posts: 7
Groups: TILOS

Hi,

If you can, please give me some advice regarding this Delay Analysis Problem.  I used “Impacted As Planned” method to analyses delays.

For the very first delay Event, I just took the Baseline & Impact the Delay into that. Now, my Problem is for the Next Delay event, should I use the Baseline or Already Impacted Programme to demonstrate the Delay Analysis.

Thank You

Replies

Khuong Do
User offline. Last seen 1 year 51 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 21 Feb 2010
Posts: 118
Groups: None

Hi,

I write an article regarding How to perform Impacted As-Planned Delay Analysis in Primavera P6.

If you're interested, kindly read it here https://doduykhuong.com/2016/09/19/how-to-perform-impacted-as-planned-delay-analysis-in-primavera-p6/

Mike Testro
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 4418

Hi Prageeth

You should impact your delay events in strict chronological order of date of impact using the same chart in a rolling sequence.

The date of impact is the last date that the impacted activity could start after the event has run its course.

Bear in mind that the Impacted As Planned method as described in the SCL protocol 2002 is not to be used for Forensic Delay Analysis but only for Work in Progress.

Best regards

Mike Testro