Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Activity ID and relationship mismatch

8 replies [Last post]
shiv rao
User offline. Last seen 11 years 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 62
Hi guys ,

I have been facing a problem in Copy Pasting a group of activities in P6 .

when i am doing this for a group of 10 or more activities .

The Activity ID are gettign placed in a different sequence .

They go out of the last Activity Id placed and the difference also get displaced.

Bcos of which i need to go back and line the activites again.
The project contains 20000 activities almost.

Do you have solution


Shiv

Replies

Anoon Iimos
User offline. Last seen 2 years 15 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1422
Glenn,

That’s reality, and dealing with it is another kind of planning which I never learned, that’s why an ordinary employee like me gets fired always!
Ranish KT
User offline. Last seen 21 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 30 Jan 2003
Posts: 28
Shiv true P6 behaves that way. P6 sorts data in one of the column say "start" or " act description", etc. After copying data, use the same sort method used in original file. i.e click the heading as we do in excel.
Glenn Douglas
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Annon,

Thanks for the answer.

All I need to do is change the 6 PM’s and 9 clients I currently deal with for ’sane’ ones.
shiv rao
User offline. Last seen 11 years 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 62
Dear Friends ,

I am seeing people are posting replies why the issue is imporatant ?

If at all it is imporatnt to sequencially put the activities there is no harm.

If some know the solution how can it be done .
I am also a planner and understand that logic exisits but having then in a sequence its easy to understand.

Regards

Shiv Rao
Anoon Iimos
User offline. Last seen 2 years 15 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1422
Glenn,

i believe that a sane planner or pm who understands how the program (software) works will never review a 20 page pdf or hard copy of the schedule without the aid of a real soft copy for himself.
Alex Wong
User offline. Last seen 11 years 5 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 874
Groups: TILOS
Hi

Again, if the schedule is breakdown nicely, finding activity should be easy and it make no different whether the activity id is in sequency or not.

However, when I saw schedule that have 20 activities name the same, I am always wonder how the planner actually plan their project.

ID is a unique identifier, organise it nicely is good but don’t try to built in too much intelligent to it.

Alex
Glenn Douglas
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 39
This isn’t an answer to the problem.

Many people advise not using the ID as a way of sequencing activities - I agree It makes no difference to producing the Plan, however when you’re on the phone with someone on the other side of the world and they have a 20 page PDF of your plan it’s a lot easier if the ID’s are in numerical order to say for example ’look at ID number 100520’. Instead of searching for a description.

Obviously once you’ve baselined the plan for the first time you wouldn’t want to change any existing ID’s. Which is usually why we go up in 10’s and can therefore add in 9 further activities if necessary.

A column on the left which had a row number (as in MSP) would be useful at times.
David Kelly
User offline. Last seen 1 year 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 630
P6 is designed so that the Activity ID is not part of any work sequence order. Indeed as you have found using the Activity ID to chose the sequence of events is VERY difficult.

I would have to advise not using the ID as a way of sequencing activities - you will get consistent problems this way.