Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Estimate to Complete

7 replies [Last post]
Hoda Zadeh
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 27 Jun 2011
Posts: 2
Groups: None

Hi Plannners, 

Just wondering if anyone has any other suggestions / modified method for ETC calculations ???. The PF using CPI or SPI in this  calculation only looks at the past and not necessarily realstic in a dinamic project enviroment .Therefore through experience, its usually far away from what truly will happen in the projects later on.

Any thoughts , ideas , formulas you use which considers say risks? I am trying to find a more accurate number rather than just a traditional EVM method. 

Replies

Jithin Kambhikanam
User offline. Last seen 2 days 2 hours ago. Offline

Thanks Rafael.

Rafael Davila
User offline. Last seen 54 min 58 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2004
Posts: 5060

It looks like prior link no longer works, try the following.

(PDF) Earned value method as a tool for project control

Jithin Kambhikanam
User offline. Last seen 2 days 2 hours ago. Offline

Hi Rafael,

 

Thank you for the information but the "Earned value method as a tool for project control" link is not working. Could you please put it again.

 

Thanks

Jithin

Rafael Davila
User offline. Last seen 54 min 58 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2004
Posts: 5060

Earned value method as a tool for project control

6. Conclusions

……. Many organizations worldwide adopted Earned Value as a standard management tool (e.g. US Department of Defense [13], an Australian standard [14]). It is described in practically all management handbooks and incorporated into management software. However, if to be implemented, the method should be used according to its purpose: it is not a tool for forecasting; instead, it facilitates progress monitoring, determination of project status (on time? to budget?), identification of potentially negative occurrences and a rough estimate of their combined effect on the project’s outcome. If the project is to be managed consciously, these occurrences should be then investigated into by means of more accurate methods.

SDPM Approach - SDPM Approach to Project Planning and Performance Analysis.pdf

Slide #50:

Earned Value Analysis is another method that is used for estimating program/project performance.  But this method shall be used very carefully and only in combination with other methods because:
• the real situation may be distorted,
• project managers are motivated to do expensive jobs ASAP and cheap jobs ALAP,
• it does not consider if activities that were performed were critical or not,
• it does not consider project risks.

Slide #57

Earned Value Analysis supplies management with the useful information on project status.

•But it shall be used carefully and only as the supplement to other methods of project performance measurement.  In any case it is useful to analyze EV parameters trends … Positive trends show that recent project performance is better than expected. Negative trends show that buffers are consumed faster than expected and corrective actions may be necessary.

Contractors-float

For most construction jobs we are not required to use probabilistic methods, in this case instead of tracking probability trends we track deterministic trends for optimistic targets we feel comfortable.  We target for early completion in the hope as the unexpected happens we met our contractual obligation, we target to keep some Terminal Float.  In this way we keep it simple, we speak a language everyone understands.

Rodel Marasigan
User is online Online
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 1590

The historical data/ trend analysis (benchmarking) which measure the strategy, process and performance is a good based of PF that can be used. If you wanted the current scenario using the same approached on the activity, I am agreeing with Patrick using ES over ED if no data available. Otherwise use the current PF that has been measured from the beginning of the activity unless the approached or methodology has been changed.

Patrick Weaver
User offline. Last seen 1 week 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2001
Posts: 284
Groups: None

If you want a prediction of likely completion the two methods that work are:

1. Earned Schedule (ES)

2. Earned duration

Both are based on significant data that shows consistently the best predicter of future outcomes is performance to date.  Project manager's don;t like this - their project is always special; but data from 1000s of projects tends to suggest they are not!  Traditional SPI cannot predict time outcomes (it is a cost measure). 

My prefernace is Eaned Schdule over Earned Duation simpl because it fits into an overall EVMS with minimal additional work.  The answer from ES is not set in concrete - its simply the most likely outcome; to change the outcome you actually need to change the way work is accomplished, not analyse probabililities. Management needs to do things to improve work practices, improve resource availability, reduce interfearance in the work, etc.  Then at the next update you can see if the implemented changes have been effective, if that are, keep doing them, if not try something different. 

For more on this see: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PMKI-SCH-010.php#Process6

I don't think that risk simulation can be replaced by adjusting PF.

We use Success Driven Project Management approach based on success probability trends analysis.

Look at http://www.spiderproject.com/images/img/pdf/General%20Project%20Management/Project%20Control%20Methodologies.pdf for the review of project control methodologies.