This forum is predominantly used by construction professionals.
You have to remember that the people who develop programming software are geeks not builders.
Programming software is used for many industries as well as construction but the programmers are not pharmacists or industrialists either.
In manufacturing for instance with a production flow line the SS plus lag combined with FF creates a "ladder" chart which replicates the production method.
This method has no place in construction although my sparring partner Vladimir will disagree when planning linear projects such as pipelines.
The fact that a SF link is available is an example of the software writers complete ignorance of practical usage - at least Vladimir and I agree on that point.
Best regards
Mike Testro
Member for
24 years 8 months
Member for24 years9 months
Submitted by Vladimir Liberzon on Tue, 2014-08-05 21:36
I don't recommend to use SF relationship. In most cases it is used by an error. Other three reflect real life constraints and may be used. But usually SS+Lag shall be used together with FF+Lag, if an activity can start after another activity it usually shall not finish before succeding activity. So both dependencies shall be used in parallel.
Why are there 3 other types (which also make sense, except the Start to finish for my understanding ?) when only the Finish Start relation could deal with everything ?
Member for
11 years 4 monthsFS should be your most used
FS should be your most used relationship. You should never use SF relationships. In my opinion they should be removed from the program.
SS and FF are useful in certain circumstances but especially in a TAR schedule will be very limited.
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi FlorisThis forum is
Hi Floris
This forum is predominantly used by construction professionals.
You have to remember that the people who develop programming software are geeks not builders.
Programming software is used for many industries as well as construction but the programmers are not pharmacists or industrialists either.
In manufacturing for instance with a production flow line the SS plus lag combined with FF creates a "ladder" chart which replicates the production method.
This method has no place in construction although my sparring partner Vladimir will disagree when planning linear projects such as pipelines.
The fact that a SF link is available is an example of the software writers complete ignorance of practical usage - at least Vladimir and I agree on that point.
Best regards
Mike Testro
Member for
24 years 8 monthsFloris,I don't recommend to
Floris,
I don't recommend to use SF relationship. In most cases it is used by an error. Other three reflect real life constraints and may be used. But usually SS+Lag shall be used together with FF+Lag, if an activity can start after another activity it usually shall not finish before succeding activity. So both dependencies shall be used in parallel.
Member for
11 years 3 monthsWhy ?Why are there 3 other
Why ?
Why are there 3 other types (which also make sense, except the Start to finish for my understanding ?) when only the Finish Start relation could deal with everything ?
Member for
19 years 10 monthsHi FlorisThe simple answer is
Hi Floris
The simple answer is only use FS links in any form of programming.
Best regards
Mike Testro