Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Recovery Program with additional manhours

4 replies [Last post]
Kannan CP
User offline. Last seen 5 days 14 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 283
Groups: None

Hi,

Contractor's schedule is loaded with manhours for the progress measurement. Due to significant delays, recovery program is being developed with additional resources, means additional manhours to meet the agreed target date.

Is it ok to add additional manhours to activities to show the recovery action, but this will affect the total manhours and accordingly the progress values already reported. or is it enough to explain the recovery actions in the narrative and keeping the original manhours as it is, without affecting the progress measurement.

Please share any input.

Replies

sharief sheikh
User offline. Last seen 1 week 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2008
Posts: 12
Groups: None

If you intend to keep the reported stable. I would recommend you create new activities to indicate recovery tasks and load those additional hours to these activities. While calculating progress you can exclude these activities from progress calculation. However, for your manpower calculation (or Histograms) always use complete manhours. This way you know required the manpower as well keep the reported progress consistent.  

Zoltan Palffy
User offline. Last seen 3 days 13 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 3085
Groups: None

if you dont add the additional manhours you will not know how many men you need and can therefore not staff it accordingly

there are 3 ways to recover lost time 

option 1 - Crash the Schedule

look at the critical path and reduce durations this will require more manpower to do the same amounto f work in a shorther period of time. Caution check all successor LAGS because if there was a lag especially a start to start lag which was  to overlap the successor activity may no longer over lap due to shorting of the duration.

I.E. originaly Activity A 10 days duration successor to activity B Start to start with a 5 day overlap

recovery schedule reduced duration of activity A to 5 days but the relationship stayed the same there for the activites do not overlap as originally indended. 

Option 2 - Fast Track the schedule

look at the critical path and make activites there that were to be perfomed sequentially and make them parallel so that they are now scheduled to be doen concurently. Manhours stay the same just logic changes

Option #3 - Crash and Fast Track

implement both options #1 and #2

Kannan CP
User offline. Last seen 5 days 14 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 283
Groups: None

thanks rodel..

Rodel Marasigan
User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 1691

If the contractor recovery action is to accelerate the program by adding more resources to mitigate the delay without any additional cost to the client, the client might accept the program and accept as a re-baseline or new baseline. This is should be clearly explain in Basis of Schedule.