Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Opinions regarding the display of long lead items on a programme

2 replies [Last post]
Edward McCabe
User offline. Last seen 1 year 51 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 13 Feb 2019
Posts: 5
Groups: None

Is it better practice to summarise long lead items in one summary bar at the top or bottom of the chart, separated from the construction activities or amongst the construction activities?

In my experience, putting the lead ins as line items immediately above the installation activity seems to throw some colleagaues as they misinterpret the procurement durations as being part of the on site durations for say the fit out of a particular unit; while others fail to pick up the long lead items at all if they are separated on the programme page.


Santosh Bhat
User offline. Last seen 2 days 5 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 338

Most Programmes are sperated into high level grops of such as Design, Procurement, Construction, Commissioning etc.

The long lead items sould exist in the Procurement area with lower levels of grouping typically by the procurement work package type, but potentially also by the discipline or location, or responsibile manager etc.

Zoltan Palffy
User offline. Last seen 1 day 21 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 2976
Groups: None

If you assign them to their own wbs it should not matter. At the top should always be milestones because they are the most important thnig.