Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

using - lag

1 reply [Last post]
Martin Gomez
User offline. Last seen 11 years 33 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 14
Groups: None

Hi Everyone

                       Is it a good practice to use - lag  in a programme.could any of you guys please tell me the drawbacks of using negative float.  Thanks

Sach

Replies

Gary Whitehead
User offline. Last seen 4 years 46 weeks ago. Offline

Negative lag or negative float? They are not the same thing

As a general rule, using negative lag is poor practise. any lags used should be there to reflect reality. Genuine situations where activity B cannot start until x days before activity A has finished are few and far between. The vast majority of negative lags around are used becuase the planner is too lazy to split his activities down into enough detail to enable proper FS links with zero lag.

 

Negative float (generated by using a must finish by constraint at the end of the project when you are running later than the constraint date) can be a useful method of understanding which activities have to be brought forward to recover delay, and by how much. It's a poor relation for those of us who don't have the software to calculate DRAG, and using it this way goes against how CPM and total float were originally intended to be used. -So do so with caution.

 

Cheers,

 

G