Website Upgrade Incoming - we're working on a new look (and speed!) standby while we deliver the project

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

MS PROJECT SERVER OR PRIMAVERA P6?

12 replies [Last post]
Fri, 2008-08-01 13:32
Mathieu HOULES
User offline. Last seen 14 years 51 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Aug 2008
Posts: 8
Groups: None
Hello

Being Project Planning Engineer in a company running several major projects (several hundreds of thousand hours required) at the same time, I’m be interested in the solutions provided by softwares such as PRIMAVERA or MS PROJECT SERVER concerning the following axis : project planning & scheduling, ressources management, progress estimation, collaborative features, reporting...

PRIMAVERA is often presented as the most advanced solution...

I would need some info to select one solution

If you’re already user of such a soft, may I have your feedback (pros / cons...)?
Could you also give me some idea as regard investment related to set up thi kind of solution in a company

In advance I thank you for your support

Best Regards
Top

Replies

Thu, 2012-03-01 08:06
#1
abc efg
User offline. Last seen 13 years 13 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Groups: None

There are many differences b/w Primavera and MS Project. Here is a list of prominent differences between both the software

 

http://tinyurl.com/7zud4ga

Top
Wed, 2008-08-13 10:28
#2
Oliver Melling
User offline. Last seen 5 years 35 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 595
Groups: The GrapeVine
As for the P3/6 debate.

’It was better for my grandad to learn how to send an email rather than for me to start hand-writing letters’
Top
Wed, 2008-08-13 09:03
#3
Se de Leon
User offline. Last seen 3 years 42 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 15 May 2001
Posts: 321
Groups: None
My 2 cents gentlemen.

I think what’s happening is similar to what happened to Miscrosoft vs. Apple Operating Systems or Microsoft vs. Linux Operating Systems. Since Miscrosoft got the headstart with promoting and marketing their product first, and people were impressed and got used to it, they were able to capture large chunk of the market and kept it. Some companies are reluctant to make the change, either their happy with the product or they just resist change.

The bottom line is,why fix it if it’s not broken.

This sounds like P3 vs. P5/P6 all over again, doesn’t it?
Top
Wed, 2008-08-13 03:45
#4
Oliver Melling
User offline. Last seen 5 years 35 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 595
Groups: The GrapeVine
Vlad,

I think the problem comes when trying to recruit planners, as if the software is rare, then so are the people who can use it.

Oliver
Top
Tue, 2008-08-12 15:13
#5
Vladimir Liberzon
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 5 Feb 2001
Posts: 2753
Groups: Accreditation Editors, Board of Advisors, Civil Engineering, GPCCAR Editors, Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas, Regional Representatives, Spider Project Team, TURNAROUND & SHUTDOWN (T/A & S/D)
Alexandre,
is it a real problem? If the software is really good and exports the resulting schedules to well known packages like MS Project and Primavera then it may be successfully used everywhere. At the moment we have branches only in 5 countries and happy customers in 22. I am sure that AstaDev can support its French customers across the Channel.

I agree with Paul - any software is a tool that shall be properly used. Project Management System implementation is a key to success. The tool alone is useless regardless of its functionality.

Best Regards,
Vladimir
Top
Tue, 2008-08-12 09:01
#6
Paul Harris
User offline. Last seen 2 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 11 Apr 2001
Posts: 618
Groups: Content Moderators, GPCCAR Editors
I agree with Darren, James and Mal.

The European scheduling software like Asta and Spider is a way ahead of the US counterparts in functionality and a lot cheaper. But the software is only a small part of the equation. The people and business processes, including the discipline to ensure the data is correctly processed is the most important and the right people will make any software work irrespective of how good or bad it is. With good software people who do not know what they are doing will make a bigger mess quicker!

Paul E Harris
Eastwood Harris Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
Planning and Scheduling Training Manual & Book Publishers, Consulting and Training
www.eh.com.au
Top
Tue, 2008-08-05 07:07
#7
Darren Kosa
User offline. Last seen 8 years 15 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Feb 2008
Posts: 256
Groups: None
Hi Mathieu,

Although I currently use MS Project, I would agree with Mal.

If I had to choose, I’d take Asta over Primavera and either of those two over MS Project.

Powerproject / Teamplan will probably work out cheaper to implement, you can import / export from / to Primavera and MS Project and it also has a free viewer so subs / clients don’t have to purchase the application to look at the schedule.

I’m not sure it’s that well known in France, but in the UK it’s arguably the weapon of choice for the construction industry.

You can download a free demo here.

Regards,

Darren
Top
Tue, 2008-08-05 07:04
#8
James Griffiths
User offline. Last seen 16 years 20 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 May 2006
Posts: 435
Groups: None
We have been using Project Central for the past 6 years. This is the earlier version of Project Server. The advantage of using P/Server is that the engineers book their time directly to activities within the programme. All this data is then automatically sucked into the programme to give you values of progress, forecast costs, resource profiles etc. etc. all integrated into one common data-warehouse.

Now all this sounds very good...and in principle it IS very good. However, if you want to avoid total crap emerging from the data-warehouse, it is absolutely essential that the administration of the programme data is undertaken extremely thoroughly. If not, the data will become rat-sh*t very quickly.

One of the main issues is that engineers are extremely sloppy when it comes to booking against the correct activity, or amending their remaining hours. As the source of the "working data" is in the hands of the engineers, all susbequent data will depend on their weekly bookings.

Ultimately, it doesn’t matter how good the software functionality is, if all you are manipulating is poo. So, be warned......and believe me, it really is hard work to keep some levels of sanity to the data.

James.
Top
Tue, 2008-08-05 03:23
#9
Mal Leadbetter
User offline. Last seen 11 years 37 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 22 Aug 2001
Posts: 61
Groups: TILOS
Have a look at a solution from Asta using PowerProject or TeamPlan
Top