Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

insurance liability question

1 reply [Last post]
John Reeves
User offline. Last seen 3 days 17 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 10 May 2013
Posts: 141
Groups: None
Question about insurance liability - this one is only tangently related to our usual schedule items. I am looking at the “value” at bid time of the owner moving from a cap on liability for the contractor comparing 100% of the contract price on liability vs. 50% of the contract price.  The question is:  what, if anything, would the market dictate in terms of the value can I/they expect to yield in bids if we stay at the 50% cap vs. a 100% cap?  Also if an unlimited cap (or no cap) if that helps answer it. I assume it might be more complicated than just comparing two quotes, particularly if you are not the one getting the quotes but have to make a judgement on values.

Replies

Patrick Weaver
User offline. Last seen 1 week 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2001
Posts: 284
Groups: None

This is a question regarding the cost of risk. 

From both the client and the contractor's perspective, the risk has a price, usually defined by insurance premiums and insurance excesses. A project quote will/should include the insurance premium plus the cost of a number of excesses expected to be outlaid.  

Questions for the client include:

  1. Is it more cost effective to take out one overall policy for the project and therefore avoid paying the premiums that would otherwise be included each contractor/subcontractor contract? This is becoming more popular but has issues in managing claims and excesses. 
  2. Will contractors adequately consider and proactively manage risk if they are not paying for it. 
  3. Caps on liability reduce contractor risk exposure and therefore should result in reduced costs, but how can this be assessed?
  4. If the risk exposure is too high will this deter competent contractors from submitting a bid leaving the client with either no bids or only bids from less competent contractors desperate for work (and do you want this type of organisation running your project)?

There is not 'right answer' to these questions and no way of knowing if the decisions made were optimum, even after the project is complete. 

The question a competent contractor should ask is 'is the potential reward from this project worth the risk?'.  

What has become apparent in the last couple of decades is the proactive management of risk by the client really delivers dividends; there is no such thing as a 'risk free project', and it is impossible to transfer all risk to other parties by way of contract: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PMKI-SCH-045.php