Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Earned Value Adjustment

No replies
Amro Ahmed
User offline. Last seen 1 week 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 5 Jan 2009
Posts: 107

Hi All,

There is earned value adjustment shall be done in case Of Finishin the activity less than BAC.

let me clarify:

Act  A1000  BAC =1,000,000 U.S.D   ACT ST 01-DEC-15   ACT FS 30-DEC-15       Finished at 500,000 U.S.D


1- updae 100%  and actual dates  -impact showing EV=1,000,000 INSTEAD OF 500,000

2- Update 50% ,actual start and ETC=0 - Impact Showing the activity in progress ehile in reality it has been finished

3- Update 100% with actual dates and add new activity with -500,000 to B.L then update -Impact BAC will change from 1,000,000 to 500,000  which not correct

Im convenced with option 1 while my superior convenced with option 3 and im trying to convence

Please advice about the propper one and if there is any other option?



Paul Kidston
User offline. Last seen 5 years 43 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 3 Feb 2003
Posts: 4
Groups: None

Option 1 is clearly the "correct" answer, unless budgetting errors are being corrected, in which case the organisations procedurs should state how to proceed.