Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Assurance accreditation is unbiased, accurate, etc.

5 replies [Last post]
Dave Crosby
User offline. Last seen 5 years 12 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Posts: 79
(4) How can we assure the market / employers that such accreditation is unbiased and indeed accurate?

Replies

Gary Whitehead
User offline. Last seen 19 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Unbiased:

To ensure unbiased assesment of written exams is fairly simple -you just ensure the assesor has no access to the canidate’s name, gender, race, nationality, etc.

For interviews, many governments and companies have policies and procedures in place to ensure recruiting is unbiased, and I would have thought it a fairly simple matter to transfer them to an accreditation interview. I’m thinking of things like standard questions, at least 2 interviewers, standard criteria of assesment, etc.

Accurate:

Tough one. This would all come down to choosing the right assesment criteria, and ensuring a consistent application of those criteria. I would also suggest feedback be sought from recruiters one this scheme is up and running, so if recruiters are consistenly dissapointed with the quality of accredited candidates we know we need to make the criteria more challenging, and vise versa.

Anoon Iimos
User offline. Last seen 26 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1416
How to be unbiased?

1. Never consider Politics.
2. No Profits (Money) Involved (But how can you survive?).
3. Measure based on education, skills and experience.

for item 2, a reasonable fee maybe imposed..?
Nestor Principe
User offline. Last seen 8 years 18 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 23 Oct 2008
Posts: 151
Only time will tell if the accreditation is unbiased and accurate. Be optimistic, when members are out there doing planning and scheduling, in due time, the employer will look if the planner is a member before recruitment. The standard to be established will play a big role.

One good way to start, maybe, is to get commitment from pp members, a headcount.

Cheers to all...
Dave Crosby
User offline. Last seen 5 years 12 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 8 Oct 2008
Posts: 79
One way to assist this is to have a unique accreditation number stored on a database. This should be available for prospective employers to access to check that the person they are interviewing is indeed accredited.
Charleston-Joseph...
User offline. Last seen 8 years 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 1347
Groups: None
We cannot be assure the market /employers because in will not make any difference anyway since:

in most countries, the position are achieve through political connection not by accreditation.

In some countries, the client’s preference are sons of their native lands, so even though we have international accreditation, we cannot impose on the client’s preference.

in all practicality, it is easiear to answer in the negative, the naysayers,

being on the positive side needs a Don Quixote’s attitude or character to achieve results.

Cheers,
happy planning and scheduling