Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Contractor to provide a critical path (as-built versus as-planned) schedule analysis

1 reply [Last post]
Sat, 2016-11-05 09:17
Md Manjar Nadeem
User offline. Last seen 2 years 21 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 9 Feb 2013
Posts: 9
Groups: GPC Malaysia, GPC Qatar, Petro-Chem / Oil & Gas
  • Contractor to provide a critical path (as-built versus as-planned) schedule analysis for the Work assigned to Contractor which takes into account concurrent delays and the delays caused by Contractor.

As a contractor we submitted Global Claim at end of project (Civil+MEP) , As per above statement from Client I feel it's confusing they asking Two Schedule Analysis method together , critical path schedule analysis at this end of project is not possible because schedule is already actualised, as-built vs as planned is easy and possible - Any Claim expert could you clarify above statement & my approach is correct??

Top

Replies

Sat, 2016-11-05 12:40
#1
Mike Testro
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 4418
Groups: Building Information Modelling, Content Moderators, GPCCAR Editors

Hi MD

The text is a clumsy description of a Time Impact Analysis.

Global claims always fail in a tribunal but they can be a useful negotiating tool.

Best regards

Mike Testro

Top