Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Delay Analysis Method in Assessment of Concurrent Delays

5 replies [Last post]
Dimple Dean
User offline. Last seen 6 years 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 20 Oct 2015
Posts: 18
Groups: None

Hi All!

I would like to ask what is the best method in analyzing Concurrent Delays?
What are the steps in analyzing Concurrent Delays?

Thanks in advance!

Replies

Bialla Rafiq
User offline. Last seen 6 years 23 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19 Oct 2017
Posts: 16
Groups: None

Hi 

CPM critical path method discussion i read here, 

but if the works which supposed to be completed by 1-6-16 and contractor completed the works on 1-10-16 . 

so there are delays from 1-6-16 to 1-10-16 - 

1- what are the critical activities- activities which not completed by 1-6-16 - 

2- who is responsible for such delay appeared within period 1-6-16 to 1-10-16 - for this what method to be used . 

  a. suppose first delay appear by the employer due to stoppage of works in 17-jul-16 

  b. second delay in 9- Sep, 16 due to power issue from the authorities 

3-  there are employer delays and contractor delays and concurrent delays - how to establish

 

Regards

Bilal

Anders Axelson
User offline. Last seen 3 years 13 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6 Dec 2003
Posts: 41
Groups: None

The short answer is the critical path method (CPM). That is to say, when two delays occur at the same time, the delay that is deemed to be causative of the delay to the whole project is that which occurs on the critical/longest path. If the two respective paths share critical/longest path status for longer than an instant (which is relatively uncommon), however, you have a tie - and so a tiebreaker is needed. The proper way for breaking the tie (favouring one delay or the other, or apportioning evenly) depends on your contract and probably, your local law.

Mike Testro
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 4418

Hi Philip - Welcome to Planning Planet.

Time Impact Analysis (SCL definition) is used for Forensic - Retrospective - Impacted analysis because that is when you have As Built data.

Best regards

Mike Testro

Philip Hoskins
User offline. Last seen 7 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 2
Groups: GPC Qatar

Mike, can I ask you in relation to your comment about the TIA method of delay analysis to identify concurrent delay, are you meaning TIA prospective or retrospective or both. Thanks Phil

Mike Testro
User offline. Last seen 4 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 4418

Hi Dimple

A simple question that requires a large thesis to answer - in fact there are many but mine is the most reliable..

In short the only available method that can be relied upon to show concurrency is a Time Impact Analysis where BOTH Employer and Contractor's delay are analysed correctly.

You must also input neutral tasks such as Weather & Force Majeur - remebering that some of these may be Insurance risks.

Then you have to consider which jurisdiction applies - Is it Winner Takes All or Apportionment.

Only for the brave hearted to put their expert reputation on the line.

Best regards

Mike Testro