Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

How good is your country at reporting covid-19 statistics - it is a mess.

3 replies [Last post]
Rafael Davila
User offline. Last seen 1 day 3 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2004
Posts: 5229

I do not believe Covid 19 could be tacked effectiviely if your country statistics are poor.  

Image-027

Such numbers are misleading, 100% positivity rate!

Whoever publishes some numbers without having the necessary information loses credibility.  It is simple if you are incapable of getting the necessary information do not publish any number.

I wonder if the reporting in your countries is this bad.

Replies

Rafael Davila
User offline. Last seen 1 day 3 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2004
Posts: 5229

Some sites such as covidtracking.com do not report misleading numbers.

https://covidtracking.com/analysis-updates/test-positivity-in-the-us-is-a-mess

Image-053

Rafael Davila
User offline. Last seen 1 day 3 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2004
Posts: 5229

The following is another site again with different results.

Image-030

And another.

Image-032

The difference in reported infection rate among these two sites is abysmal!

Until there is no uniform reporting standard it will continue being a mess.

Rafael Davila
User offline. Last seen 1 day 3 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 1 Mar 2004
Posts: 5229

They say some territories do not report negative results.

  • Puerto Rico does not report negative results for one logical reason: The reported number of patients tested do not represent the same patients included in the reported number of patients tested positive due to a lag between the date the specimen is collected and the availability of test results. Positivity rates cannot be inferred by dividing patients tested positive by patients tested for this reason.
  • I do not mean to say it is not possible to pair same day test results, this would mean true positivity rate will lag several days the day the specimens are collected.  
  • It looks like PR figured it out how to estimate positivity rate better than showing 100%, a meaningless value that is not credible.
  •  
  • If you do not have the data you shall not report any number, to show 100% is wrong, these "fake news" makes their credibility go down the drain.