Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

FF Relationships

3 replies [Last post]
Forum Guest
User offline. Last seen 2 years 28 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Groups: None
Hi Planners
when making a cpm schedule using p3,whats the advantages or disadvantages of using finish to finish relations between activities?and is it nescceray to use them?

Replies

Ronald Winter
User offline. Last seen 3 years 6 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2003
Posts: 928
Groups: None
[Mis-posting by Nestor transferred to this forum by Moderator.]

I think the usefulness of SS relationships needs no discussion.
There´s two situations in which FF ralationships are a must:
- When the succesor activity is shorter in duration than the predecesor.
- After the predecesor in a SS relationship has started, progress override breaks the relationship and it is left without a succesor, therefore it would appear to have a large float until the end of the project duration. An FF relationshio to replace the previos solves the problem.
Nestor Principe
User offline. Last seen 20 years 7 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Posts: 19
Groups: None
If the completion of two activities are physically dependent to each other then FF relationship is a must. Avoiding the use of FF and/or SS relationship would make a CPM programme easy to maintain when you status the programme.

Regards,

Nestor
Ronald Winter
User offline. Last seen 3 years 6 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2003
Posts: 928
Groups: None
There are many reasons for using FF relationships. For example, such a relationship will properly show the effects of a delay to the predecessor on the successor activity.