Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Assessing Delay – the SCL Options.

No replies
Patrick Weaver
User offline. Last seen 22 hours 40 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2001
Posts: 373
Groups: None

Our latest paper Assessing Delay – the SCL Options. Has been published in the April edition of PM World Journal. This paper reviews The Society of Construction Law, Delay and Disruption Protocol (2nd edition), and contrasts the SCL Protocol with AACE® International Recommended Practice No. 29R-03 Forensic Schedule Analysis (2011 Ed.)

In most respects, the two documents take a very similar approach to assessing delay and disruption on construction projects. The fundamental difference is in the focus of the documents, the objective SCL Protocol is to provide useful guidance on some of the common delay and disruption issues that arise on construction projects, with a view to minimizing disputes, whereas AACEi 29R-03 focuses on forensically analyzing delays after the dispute has arisen.

To download Assessing Delay – the SCL Options, and  more papers focused on delay, disruption and acceleration see: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PMKI-ITC-020.php#ADD