Guild of Project Controls: Compendium | Roles | Assessment | Certifications | Membership

Tips on using this forum..

(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?

(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.

Progress Clause in Contracts

6 replies [Last post]
Uri Shachar
User offline. Last seen 6 years 37 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 82
Groups: None
Under most forms of standard Construction Contracts in Australia ’the Contractor must plan to achieve PC by the Date for PC’.

What do you think the Contractor should do under the following circumstances:

1. The Contractor’s Date for PC is different from the PM’s.
2. The Contractor knows that realistacaly the Date for PC can not be achieved.
3. The Date for PC has come and gone, but the Works are not complete

Thanx

Replies

Charleston-Joseph...
User offline. Last seen 2 years 35 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 1347
Groups: None
Hi to all.

I think it is better to let the flow of the approved status Contract Program run its own course. If the completion dates show different dates than the PC dates, then there must be a justifialbe reason on why it happen. It may not be properly assess during the concurrent of construction activities considering the impacts that cause delays are on-going, but somehow this kind of phenomenon should be look at by the contractor.

The best the contractor can do is to hire specialist in contracutal claims including forensic planners. Re-evaluate all documents and look for ways to get out of the mess since generally contact documents protect the interest of both parties. Somewhere along the construction timeline changes are bound to happen that will impact on the completion dates that contractors should use to protect their interest.
Andrew Flowerdew
User offline. Last seen 2 years 19 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 960
Groups: None
Stuart,

You’re 100% correct to say the contractor has an obligation to finish on time and should plan accordingly and we shouldn’t encourage anything else.

However, commercially it may not be so straight forward and depending on the circumstances (company reputation, prestige, repeat work, etc)the contractor may elect to follow the course of action which dents his bank account the least.
Stuart Ness
User offline. Last seen 12 years 11 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 352
Groups: None
Uri,

I would suggest that the Contractor has an obligation not just to plan to achieve completion as required, but must actually reach completion by the due date.
If he finds that his planned completion date is inconsistent with the due contractual due date, then he has an obligation to re-schedule and reallocate his resources such that the due completion date can be attained. Failure to do so would probably put him in breach of Contract.

You ask what should the Contractor do if he realises that realistically the due completion date cannot be reached. The answer to this will depend at which stage the Contractor realises this situation. Is it once the ink is dry on the Contract? Is it after he gets possession of the site? Is it after he has completed the foundations? Etc etc…

If the due date for completion has come and gone and he is not completed, the Contractor should research for excusable delays during the execution of the project, and submit a claim for EOT accordingly (though if he waits until after completion of the project, he may well be out of time!!).

If the Contractor has no excusable causes for the delay – in other words, if he himself has caused the delays to completion – there is little else he can do other than bite the bullet and pay up his liquidated damages!! And of course, learn from his mistakes!!

Cheers,

Stuart

www.rosmartin.com
Andrew Flowerdew
User offline. Last seen 2 years 19 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 960
Groups: None
Uri,

If the contractor has made an honest mistake he could do two things:

1, Talk to the client very very nicely and try and resolve the issue!

2, Assuming the client won’t play ball, weigh up the cost of accelerating versus LD’s (if they exist) and do whichever is cheapest.

There are other options but I’m not going to suggest them!!!
Uri Shachar
User offline. Last seen 6 years 37 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 11 May 2003
Posts: 82
Groups: None
Ronald,

Thanks for your post. I was referring to a situation whereby the Contractor realizes he can not complete the Works by the Date for PC after he started (let’s assume that because of his own delays).

I would like to clarify: I’ve asked what should the Contractor do in regards to his statused Contract Programme, and its completion date (be it the date for or the date of PC).
Ronald Winter
User offline. Last seen 3 years 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2003
Posts: 928
Groups: None
If the Contractor bids a project that requires that he complete within a certain time but “he knows that he cannot,” then either the Contractor has made a fraudulent claim (promising more that he knows that he can deliver) or he has factored the damages for late completion into his bid. If fraud, then indict. If it was an economic decision, then let him complete the contract. This isn’t a ‘tough dilemma.’

Buy the way, this idea of “cannot be completed in the time allotted” is something that many tell themselves to justify the acts that follow. Most any project can be completed in the allowable time; sometimes with extraordinary effort or costly construction techniques. This phrase is often used with the assumption of normal working plan. Did it ever occur that the Owner may not want a normal, most effective cost plan?

Look to your assumptions first for the answer. Bidding low on a project because ‘everyone else will’ is a major reason that Contractors go bankrupt. Not every Expert Carpenter is qualified to be a General Contractor. There is no universal power to keep bad businessmen for entering a business that they do not understand.