I think you will agree Joseph, that It would have been more than helpful if a member of the Users group would have assisted. How long do they want the programming issues within their contract to remain ’woolley’ and ill-defined?
Member for
21 years 9 months
Member for21 years9 months
Submitted by Stuart Atkinson on Tue, 2005-06-21 06:44
The PM is under a clear obligation to accept/reject the programme within a set time frame (Cl31.3). My understanding is that a failure to do so would lead to a dispute under 90.1 and the matter should be refered to adjudicator for resolution.
From past experienece I have often had programmes not replied to, however for political reasons there has not been the desire to take this to adudication. The situation of neither acceptance or rejection of the latest programme makes it difficult to operate the other clauses of the contract, in particular in relation to quoting for compensation events.
Member for
21 years 9 months
Member for21 years9 months
Submitted by Stuart Atkinson on Tue, 2005-06-14 04:07
I am not particularly after specific areas; I just want planners thoughts on areas such as acceptance of the programme by the PM-is he required to accept, if not there appears to be no remedy.
Member for
20 years 6 months
Member for20 years6 months
Submitted by Jihad Daniel on Tue, 2005-06-14 04:00
Please be more specific and tell me your thoughts about these 2 clauses in order to share our ideas. Its essential to differentiate between acceptance, consent, approval and agreement of programmes.
Member for
21 years 9 monthsRE: Programme acceptance
I think you will agree Joseph, that It would have been more than helpful if a member of the Users group would have assisted. How long do they want the programming issues within their contract to remain ’woolley’ and ill-defined?
Member for
21 years 9 monthsRE: Programme acceptance
Thanks Joseph
Member for
22 years 9 monthsRE: Programme acceptance
Stuart
Also working on a Option C contract
The PM is under a clear obligation to accept/reject the programme within a set time frame (Cl31.3). My understanding is that a failure to do so would lead to a dispute under 90.1 and the matter should be refered to adjudicator for resolution.
From past experienece I have often had programmes not replied to, however for political reasons there has not been the desire to take this to adudication. The situation of neither acceptance or rejection of the latest programme makes it difficult to operate the other clauses of the contract, in particular in relation to quoting for compensation events.
Member for
21 years 9 monthsRE: Programme acceptance
Thanks for your reply.
I am not particularly after specific areas; I just want planners thoughts on areas such as acceptance of the programme by the PM-is he required to accept, if not there appears to be no remedy.
Member for
20 years 6 monthsRE: Programme acceptance
Dear Stuart,
Please be more specific and tell me your thoughts about these 2 clauses in order to share our ideas. Its essential to differentiate between acceptance, consent, approval and agreement of programmes.
Regards,
J. Daniel