In my example total supply was increased but there is an excess of 2000 units that should be solved. In this case figuring out the date is easy but what about more complex scenarios?
Is it good idea to display a date?
Member for
24 years 9 months
Member for24 years9 months
Submitted by Vladimir Liberzon on Sat, 2021-01-30 19:20
It is not that by 04-02-21 all Material B is spent, by this date no Material B is spent and all of the supply by Activity 1 (-500) is still available.
Perhaps it should read - On 04-02-21 Material A availability is not sufficient for scheduling of remaining activities.
I guess the solution to this issue is on the scheduler not on the software; can be solved by increasing supply before this date, can be solved by decreasing consumption after, or by a combination.
Member for
24 years 9 months
Member for24 years9 months
Submitted by Vladimir Liberzon on Fri, 2021-01-29 11:42
Spider Project reports that on certain date it cannot start the next activity because available materials are not sufficient for its execution untill the end.
If consumption preceeds the supply then consumption activity cannot start and Spider Project reports that on certain date material availability is not sufficient for scheduling of remaining activities.
Member for
13 years 2 months
Member for13 years2 months
Submitted by bogdanleonte on Fri, 2021-01-29 11:12
I recreated the example. It is a bit confusing I admit, but in the Reason of delay for activity 2 Spider fills in „Material "Material A" (Code: A); 0 days”.
So you could filter for this.
It would be great if in the schedule report you would get similar to resources...Activity 2 (Code:2) is delayed due to Material A (Code:A) which is spent on xx.yy.zzzz hh:mm
Maybe in the Material Gantt a vertical red line could be drawn in order to highlight material supply constraints (this is implemented in the Resource Gantt).
I agree with Rafael, this is confuse me too. I try two variations this schedule, first makes activity 3 SS(start-start) with activity 2, but the dialog says same thing:
[[wysiwyg_imageupload:7609:]]
Second Option, how activity 3 depends on from activity 2, I changed for activity 2 be supplier and activity 3 be consumer, and the dialog anymore shows. Maybe algorithym consider that the supplier must comming first than consumer? like figure bellow!
I agree with Rafael, this is confuse me too. I try two variations this schedule, first makes activity 3 SS(start-start) with activity 2, but the dialog says same thing:
Second Option, how activity 3 depends on from activity 2, I changed for activity 2 be supplier and activity 3 be consumer, and the dialog anymore shows. Maybe algorithym consider that the supplier must comming first than consumer? like figure bellow!
Member for
21 years 8 monthsBut what is the date that
But what is the date that matters?
Materials Gantt helps keep focused.
In my example total supply was increased but there is an excess of 2000 units that should be solved. In this case figuring out the date is easy but what about more complex scenarios?
Member for
24 years 9 monthsYes,"Material A availability
Yes,
"Material A availability is not sufficient for scheduling of remaining activities" is the right wording.
Thank you!
Member for
21 years 8 monthsIt is not that by 04-02-21
It is not that by 04-02-21 all Material B is spent, by this date no Material B is spent and all of the supply by Activity 1 (-500) is still available.
I guess the solution to this issue is on the scheduler not on the software; can be solved by increasing supply before this date, can be solved by decreasing consumption after, or by a combination.
Member for
24 years 9 monthsSpider Project reports that
Spider Project reports that on certain date it cannot start the next activity because available materials are not sufficient for its execution untill the end.
If consumption preceeds the supply then consumption activity cannot start and Spider Project reports that on certain date material availability is not sufficient for scheduling of remaining activities.
Member for
13 years 2 monthsRafael, DanielI recreated the
Rafael, Daniel
I recreated the example. It is a bit confusing I admit, but in the Reason of delay for activity 2 Spider fills in „Material "Material A" (Code: A); 0 days”.
So you could filter for this.
It would be great if in the schedule report you would get similar to resources...Activity 2 (Code:2) is delayed due to Material A (Code:A) which is spent on xx.yy.zzzz hh:mm
Maybe in the Material Gantt a vertical red line could be drawn in order to highlight material supply constraints (this is implemented in the Resource Gantt).
Best Regards,
Bogdan
Member for
7 years 6 monthsI agree with Rafael, this is
I agree with Rafael, this is confuse me too. I try two variations this schedule, first makes activity 3 SS(start-start) with activity 2, but the dialog says same thing:
[[wysiwyg_imageupload:7609:]]
Second Option, how activity 3 depends on from activity 2, I changed for activity 2 be supplier and activity 3 be consumer, and the dialog anymore shows. Maybe algorithym consider that the supplier must comming first than consumer? like figure bellow!
[[wysiwyg_imageupload:7610:]]
[[wysiwyg_imageupload:7611:]]
Best Regards,
Daniel Crisóstomo
Member for
7 years 6 monthsI agree with Rafael, this is
I agree with Rafael, this is confuse me too. I try two variations this schedule, first makes activity 3 SS(start-start) with activity 2, but the dialog says same thing:
Second Option, how activity 3 depends on from activity 2, I changed for activity 2 be supplier and activity 3 be consumer, and the dialog anymore shows. Maybe algorithym consider that the supplier must comming first than consumer? like figure bellow!
Best Regards,
Daniel Crisóstomo