progress would be based on what is done and what is not done. This will determine float values.
if you are not using manhours or cost then you will have to the original time frame vs the current date vs forecated time frame
ie
original project 1000 days
as of the current data date you are on # 500 therefore linerarly 50% of your available time frame has elasped. You should be 50% complete because 1000/500 = 50%
actual progress shows you finishing on day #1300 you are 300 days behind schedule. Data date is day #500
Therefore 1300/500 = 38% complete actual vs planned 50%
you can apply this same logic based on # of activities planned to ve completed vs # of activities actually completed
Member for
16 years 3 monthsprogress would be based on
progress would be based on what is done and what is not done. This will determine float values.
if you are not using manhours or cost then you will have to the original time frame vs the current date vs forecated time frame
ie
original project 1000 days
as of the current data date you are on # 500 therefore linerarly 50% of your available time frame has elasped. You should be 50% complete because 1000/500 = 50%
actual progress shows you finishing on day #1300 you are 300 days behind schedule. Data date is day #500
Therefore 1300/500 = 38% complete actual vs planned 50%
you can apply this same logic based on # of activities planned to ve completed vs # of activities actually completed
Member for
7 years 5 monthsCan you please elaborate a
Can you please elaborate a bit? Thanks a lot for the rest of the help.
Member for
16 years 3 monthsby manhours and cost for
by manhours and cost for physcial work