Thank you. These two statements are specific and actionable and as such have been recognized and are being reviewed and analyzed by the Guild Members. When any changes / improvements to the module are agreed to by the peer review teams, we will post notice of those findings once a decision has been made.
Because you have chosen to post your thoughts here and not via the GPCCaR Change Form suggestion template I will have to close this thread so its content can be actioned as a specific and defined scope of work for the review teams.
Thanks and Regards, GPC Admin (@Jason)
For those passionate about Project Controls and wish to become part of the decision making team, to help shape what the Guild Commnity collectively consider to be best practice guidelines, you are cordially invited to Join the Guild where you will have a voice in making these kinds of decisions.
Member for
21 years 8 months
Member for21 years8 months
Submitted by Rafael Davila on Fri, 2016-06-17 00:42
09.3.3.2.3 Capturing Productivity Related Information (Materials, People & Machines)
We do not report units in place on a daily basis as shown in Figure 8 - Sample Field Units In Place Data Capture Template. We consider it too granular when a weekly report is good enough.
We do not report units in place per CPM activity but per production process that can span several activities. We do not see added value in breaking down daily production in a multitude of activities, we consider it too granular, time consuming and of little or no value when it is enough ton report the volume total per production process.
Member for
21 years 8 months
Member for21 years8 months
Submitted by Rafael Davila on Thu, 2016-06-16 23:55
It is generally accepted that there are 3 generic categories of determining or measuring Physical % Complete ...
The module is misleading because not everyone uses % values as to measure progress. Percentages can be misleading when volume/cost/budgets/duration ... changes.
When when volume/cost/budgets/duration ... changes one of the most important performance tracking is variance but tracking % variance is misleading when there are changes in the total values while trends in absolute values are not.
The module misses to point out that all methods are valid as long as the metric used is still valid no matter if volume/cost/budgets/duration ... changes.
I use software that tracks and report all these metrics without the use of % values but absolute values that are transparent and always meaningful.
Member for
11 years 4 monthsDear Rafael,Thank you. These
Dear Rafael,
Thank you. These two statements are specific and actionable and as such have been recognized and are being reviewed and analyzed by the Guild Members. When any changes / improvements to the module are agreed to by the peer review teams, we will post notice of those findings once a decision has been made.
Because you have chosen to post your thoughts here and not via the GPCCaR Change Form suggestion template I will have to close this thread so its content can be actioned as a specific and defined scope of work for the review teams.
Thanks and Regards, GPC Admin (@Jason)
For those passionate about Project Controls and wish to become part of the decision making team, to help shape what the Guild Commnity collectively consider to be best practice guidelines, you are cordially invited to Join the Guild where you will have a voice in making these kinds of decisions.
Member for
21 years 8 months09.3.3.2.3 Capturing
09.3.3.2.3 Capturing Productivity Related Information (Materials, People & Machines)
Member for
21 years 8 months09.3.3.1 MEASURE PHYSICAL
09.3.3.1 MEASURE PHYSICAL PROGRESS
It is generally accepted that there are 3 generic categories of determining or measuring Physical % Complete ...
I use software that tracks and report all these metrics without the use of % values but absolute values that are transparent and always meaningful.