The best method to measure progress depends on the size and complexity of the project. But from experience the use of S curves are very informative, and easy for the project team to understand.
S curves normal reflect the "planned" v "actual", for this to be accurate they need in incorporate agreed EOTs. Otherwise you are monitoring a current programme/method of work against one that has been revised many times.
Baseline and asbuilt programmes also work hand in hand with the S Curve progress reporting. And it would be advisable to combine these together in a 3/4 page progress document normal produced in Excel.
Hope this helps.
David
Member for
20 years 3 months
Member for20 years3 months
Submitted by Edgar Ariete on Sat, 2006-03-25 10:36
Member for
19 years 7 monthsRE: Methods of Monitoring progress
The best method to measure progress depends on the size and complexity of the project. But from experience the use of S curves are very informative, and easy for the project team to understand.
S curves normal reflect the "planned" v "actual", for this to be accurate they need in incorporate agreed EOTs. Otherwise you are monitoring a current programme/method of work against one that has been revised many times.
Baseline and asbuilt programmes also work hand in hand with the S Curve progress reporting. And it would be advisable to combine these together in a 3/4 page progress document normal produced in Excel.
Hope this helps.
David
Member for
20 years 3 monthsRE: Methods of Monitoring progress
by tracking down planned resource cost againts actual resource cost & physical progress? or by planned quantities againts actual installed quantities?