There’s been many threads on PP discussing the use of non-FS relationships in schedules. Some people think non-FS relationships should never be used, others think there are certain circumstances in which they can be justified.
I tend to agree with the latter, but I want to know if anyone can think of a situation in which the following logic could be justified:
Activity A drives Activity B with an FF relationship
Activity B drives Activity C with an SS relationship
(all 3 activities are standard ASAP tasks)
The obvious issue being with this particular arrangement that the longer the duration of Activity B, the earlier Activity C can start.
Cheers,
G
I tend to agree with the latter, but I want to know if anyone can think of a situation in which the following logic could be justified:
Activity A drives Activity B with an FF relationship
Activity B drives Activity C with an SS relationship
(all 3 activities are standard ASAP tasks)
The obvious issue being with this particular arrangement that the longer the duration of Activity B, the earlier Activity C can start.
Cheers,
G