We have had a situation arise where we need to evaluate EOTs on three potential CEs. However we have a prior accepted CE, which has been detailed in an accepted CL32, that has grown considerably now we have learned further the seriousness of the delay, through time and investigation. Our ECC PM is claiming that the previous accepted CL32 programmes now are not valid, because of the information we now know regarding this prior CE. He is aksing that the true delay, with hindsight, be incorporated into the previously accepted programmes, BEFORE we can then evaluate the three smaller CEs. This seems to go completely against the NEC contract rules and just does not sit easy with me. Does anyone else have any experience of being asked to revise previously accepted programmes? What is the point of accepted programmes at all, if accepted programmes can be manipulated after they have been accepted?
Many thanks in advance for any help offered.