This question may have been posted before?
Does anyone know of a way to identify Relationship LOGIC TYPE (as distinct from ordinary Relationship Type; FS,SS....)
I have identified 3 logic types (there may be more);
- Physical Logic - i.e. can not physically start/finish until predecessor has started / finished
- Strategic Logic - activity sequencing is driven by higher level strategic plan.
- Discretionary Logic – Used in the absence of Types 1 or 2, essentially to eliminate dangles.
It is common practice to employ all these Logic Types. However their use is not usually documented. This makes it difficult to review the ongoing impact of type 2 & 3 logic on total float and the critical path. When reviewing the critical path it is import to know what activities are driven by Type 2, so that a strategic review can be considered. And if activities with Type 3 Logic have diminishing float their logic can be reviewed. This information is vital for the development and maintenance of a realistic Critical Path.
Richard Carpendale