Hi all,
I am in process of preparing a presentation on impact of following types of PM/ CM Services on project duration (of cource from Project Management company point of view).
1- PM: Pure PM service focusing on project strategies and procedures, construction monitoring role only.
2- PM+: More detailed PM service with basic site supervision, QA/QC and cost planning & monitoring. Suites more fast track project or Client wanting a more in depth service.
3- CM: Provides Client with greater control over the procurement & construction process with providing full package management and site management services.
4- CM+: As per CM with taking a small degree of risk.
5- MC: Act as MC employing trade contractors directly.
6- 2SGPM: same concept of MC, differes in cost.
7- 2SLC: Same concept of MC, differes in cost.
Any advice on comparing these methods specificallyin respect to the impact on overall project duration (time saving) is of a big BIG help:)
Thanks
I am in process of preparing a presentation on impact of following types of PM/ CM Services on project duration (of cource from Project Management company point of view).
1- PM: Pure PM service focusing on project strategies and procedures, construction monitoring role only.
2- PM+: More detailed PM service with basic site supervision, QA/QC and cost planning & monitoring. Suites more fast track project or Client wanting a more in depth service.
3- CM: Provides Client with greater control over the procurement & construction process with providing full package management and site management services.
4- CM+: As per CM with taking a small degree of risk.
5- MC: Act as MC employing trade contractors directly.
6- 2SGPM: same concept of MC, differes in cost.
7- 2SLC: Same concept of MC, differes in cost.
Any advice on comparing these methods specificallyin respect to the impact on overall project duration (time saving) is of a big BIG help:)
Thanks