Hi Everyone.
My point is that you cannot plan anything unless you know how to build it.
If you are just transposing a Project managers method statement into the software you are not planning anything.
So the starting point for accreditaion must be:
1. Years of experience in your speciality.
2. Years of experience with planning software.
In my opinion
1. 5 years
2. 2 years - beginner.
1. 10 years
2. 4 years - experienced.
1. 45 years
2. 20 years - thats me.
So it would be relatively simple to set up a grading system based on planning experience.
That does not address the quality of the planner.
I could have been producing rubbish for the last 20 years and got away with it.
At PEO the candidate has to draw up an original thesis for review by an admissions panel.
That approach needs a lot of time from unpaid volunteers and who is going to vet the vetters.
Another approach is for full acreditation the candidate must have at least 3 personal references relating to the quality of the work produced - graded 1 - 5.
So to start with we should all ask PP to add a section in our personal details for section 1 & 2 years of experience.
Then follow on with the grading references.
When this is all in place the accreditation system will start to fall into place automatically.
I look forward to your feed back.
Best regards
Mike Testro
My point is that you cannot plan anything unless you know how to build it.
If you are just transposing a Project managers method statement into the software you are not planning anything.
So the starting point for accreditaion must be:
1. Years of experience in your speciality.
2. Years of experience with planning software.
In my opinion
1. 5 years
2. 2 years - beginner.
1. 10 years
2. 4 years - experienced.
1. 45 years
2. 20 years - thats me.
So it would be relatively simple to set up a grading system based on planning experience.
That does not address the quality of the planner.
I could have been producing rubbish for the last 20 years and got away with it.
At PEO the candidate has to draw up an original thesis for review by an admissions panel.
That approach needs a lot of time from unpaid volunteers and who is going to vet the vetters.
Another approach is for full acreditation the candidate must have at least 3 personal references relating to the quality of the work produced - graded 1 - 5.
So to start with we should all ask PP to add a section in our personal details for section 1 & 2 years of experience.
Then follow on with the grading references.
When this is all in place the accreditation system will start to fall into place automatically.
I look forward to your feed back.
Best regards
Mike Testro