*** This thread has been started as "As Built Critical Path" had reached its Critical limit. Browsers taking too long to load. If readers wish to catch up with debate refer to previous thread by clicking here [1].***
Given the depth of discussion in the ABCP, does anyone disagree that a more appropriate term is "As Built Critical History"?
I say this on the basis that, in my view, a path in conventional planning parlance, must be connected (by logic).
It is clear from the more considered explanations by the Pro-ABCP community that the consistent principle underpinning an ABCP is simply that the activities were critical at the time.
This does not lead to the development of a retrospective path.
If we can secure consensus on this point (i.e ABCH is more appropriate than ABCP) there is much to discuss as to its implications.
Comments Welcome - especially from those who disagree with supporting argument.
Given the depth of discussion in the ABCP, does anyone disagree that a more appropriate term is "As Built Critical History"?
I say this on the basis that, in my view, a path in conventional planning parlance, must be connected (by logic).
It is clear from the more considered explanations by the Pro-ABCP community that the consistent principle underpinning an ABCP is simply that the activities were critical at the time.
This does not lead to the development of a retrospective path.
If we can secure consensus on this point (i.e ABCH is more appropriate than ABCP) there is much to discuss as to its implications.
Comments Welcome - especially from those who disagree with supporting argument.