Dear Forum contributors,
I am new member of Planning Plannet and I am very happy with it :-) Planning Planet Forum (PPF) it is my best discovery in this year! Other dicovery (but 10 years earlier) was for me old Pertmaster Advance (for DOS). In the end of XX century I have found NEW Pertmaster (i.e. Pertmaster Professional) but today we have only Pertmaster Risk (very good of course but only with risk analysis). I know other PM systems of course and I am fanatic of scheduling and project modelling in general but this post is related with non-risk features of Pertmaster (apart from Monte Carlo risk simulation and any risk specific features).
My post is related with non-risk potential of Pertmaster and oppinion of best experts in project scheduling (from Planning Planet Forum) about utility of it in practice. I am interested in oppinion of other experts in aspect of importance and acceptance of non-risk features of Pertmaster (internal @worksheet, hierarchical/sub resources, DCF analysis etc.). Actually production of Pertmaster without Monte Carlo simulatation was abandoned (unfortunately) and I want to know oppinion with this aspect. Meybe other simmilar (?) products are used for deep project analysis. Meybe we can to change decision of Pertmaster Ltd.
I will be very happy to know any oppinion of Planning Plannet Experts in aspect of it (risk is not important here). I need only discussion :-)) and oppinion of expert from other countries of the world :-) Maybe place of it new item (risk corner :-) is not good but here Pertmaster is most frequently cited ;-)
Thanks in advance for any discussion :-)
Good luck for all PlanningPlannetExperts =:-)
Tom
I am new member of Planning Plannet and I am very happy with it :-) Planning Planet Forum (PPF) it is my best discovery in this year! Other dicovery (but 10 years earlier) was for me old Pertmaster Advance (for DOS). In the end of XX century I have found NEW Pertmaster (i.e. Pertmaster Professional) but today we have only Pertmaster Risk (very good of course but only with risk analysis). I know other PM systems of course and I am fanatic of scheduling and project modelling in general but this post is related with non-risk features of Pertmaster (apart from Monte Carlo risk simulation and any risk specific features).
My post is related with non-risk potential of Pertmaster and oppinion of best experts in project scheduling (from Planning Planet Forum) about utility of it in practice. I am interested in oppinion of other experts in aspect of importance and acceptance of non-risk features of Pertmaster (internal @worksheet, hierarchical/sub resources, DCF analysis etc.). Actually production of Pertmaster without Monte Carlo simulatation was abandoned (unfortunately) and I want to know oppinion with this aspect. Meybe other simmilar (?) products are used for deep project analysis. Meybe we can to change decision of Pertmaster Ltd.
I will be very happy to know any oppinion of Planning Plannet Experts in aspect of it (risk is not important here). I need only discussion :-)) and oppinion of expert from other countries of the world :-) Maybe place of it new item (risk corner :-) is not good but here Pertmaster is most frequently cited ;-)
Thanks in advance for any discussion :-)
Good luck for all PlanningPlannetExperts =:-)
Tom