Left P3 move to MsP

Vladimir,

you’re 110% right!

Just add the following packages (at least):

Project Scheduler and Project Scheduler Next, AstaDev PowerProject, the former CA SuperProject, CA OpenWorkbench, OPX2, the one you like the most, and many others.

All the best

Jorge,

thank you for the list of features that you consider as necessary. I can add many other functional features that are not supported by P3. One shall choose the software basing on his or her requirements but P3 is not the only package that can do what you want. From your post and many other posts one can conclude that there are only two packages in the market - MSP and P3. It is not true.

Regards,

Vladimir

WHY I DON’T USE MSP:



1. My projects are large - I don’t trust MSP.

I tried a test posted before in the internet. The test consisted of developing a simple network and then adding a few resources. Result: The Critical Path SHIFTED! This should not be the case.



2. I can’t specify Project Start AND Finish Dates in MSP.



3. I sometimes need multiple relationships between activities. Not possible in MSP.



4. I want to Organize, Summarize and Analyze activities from different perspectives. Not possible in MSP.



5. I wonder if you could already adjust the timescale in MSP (dragging).



6. I trust Primavera because the developers are focused on project management. While Microsoft just develops popular everyday applications such as word processing, spreadsheet, OS, etc. That’s their strength. Their PM tool is also simple - not for complex projects.



7. I need to be able to manage my work.

Although MSP is easier to learn by yourself, it is harder to use throughout the project life cycle. If you just want to draw a bar chart and paste it on a wall and never update it, you can use MSP. If you want to really manage a project, use Primavera.



Investing in Primavera Training will pay good returns since it has the power you need. For example, defining and using different calendars (5-day workweek, 6-day workweek, 7-day workweek - all with their own holidays, plus some holidays common to all calendars) have been a nightmare to setup in MSP. In P3, it’s easy.



The only way for MSP to be at PAR with Primavera is for Microsoft to copy P3 and just put it’s name in.



Best,



Jorge

Hi Rahmat,



Basically, you are entitle to your own opinion. However you are in PP forum and everything here are full of surprise.



Surprise No. 1.: I do not agree with your statement. Disagreeing with another person opinion is a hallmark of democracy which the founders of PP wanted so much to propagate. I do not agree with your statement because whatever advantage you will get in developing a schedule in MSP will eventually wipe out as you progress in managing schedules. A case in point is creating views without distorting the original logic. In P3 you can create a lot of views that will create impact in the way you analyze, manage and present schedules without changes in the original logic. This is not possible with MSP.



Surprise No. 2.: Tell me about your reaction to my comment if this is true to you or not.



Cheers,



Charlie

Dear Rahmat,

scheduling tools are useful for calculating resource and cost constrained schedules. If your resources and finances are unlimited then you can be satisfied with any scheduling software and can choose not by functional features but by its reporting flexibility and ease of use. If you need functionality that the software does not support its ease of use will not be attractive.

We always estimate the software against our own needs.

Regards,

Vladimir

hi,

in all of my projects, using p3 is a requirement as per the contract but i also use ms project & excel for internal use only. they are more easy to understand at site level but p3 is really challenging and good project management software. so use them all is better.....

If you don’t use resources and costs in your schedules then you are right. MS Project is a nice tool for drawing Gantt Charts.