Gentlement;
One of my subcontractors had sent EOT claim for his works with impact schedule showing slippages/delays in many activities as measured against the original approved baseline schedule.
Later on, when the subcontractor submitted his monthly update of the schedule, it WAS showing "actual" dates for some activities much earlier than relevant dates in his Impact Schedule submitted along with his EOT, which means that activities he expected to be late are not actually late as evidenced by the monthly updated schedule.
CAN THIS BE CONSIDERED AS A REASON TO REJECT THIS EOT BECAUSE THE ACTIVITIES HE CLAIMED WILL BE LATE ARE SHOWN TO PROGRESS ON TIME ACOORDING TO THE MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE SUBCONTRACTOR. IN OTHER WORDS, CAN THE ACTUAL UPDATE OF THE PROGRAMME BE USED FOR COUNTERCLAIMS??
One of my subcontractors had sent EOT claim for his works with impact schedule showing slippages/delays in many activities as measured against the original approved baseline schedule.
Later on, when the subcontractor submitted his monthly update of the schedule, it WAS showing "actual" dates for some activities much earlier than relevant dates in his Impact Schedule submitted along with his EOT, which means that activities he expected to be late are not actually late as evidenced by the monthly updated schedule.
CAN THIS BE CONSIDERED AS A REASON TO REJECT THIS EOT BECAUSE THE ACTIVITIES HE CLAIMED WILL BE LATE ARE SHOWN TO PROGRESS ON TIME ACOORDING TO THE MONTHLY UPDATE OF THE SUBCONTRACTOR. IN OTHER WORDS, CAN THE ACTUAL UPDATE OF THE PROGRAMME BE USED FOR COUNTERCLAIMS??