(1) Explain your problem, don't simply post "This isn't working". What were you doing when you faced the problem? What have you tried to resolve - did you look for a solution using "Search" ? Has it happened just once or several times?
(2) It's also good to get feedback when a solution is found, return to the original post to explain how it was resolved so that more people can also use the results.
Suppose the contract contains a penalty clause of $40,000 per month for a late delivery of THE SYSTEM. There is general agreement among the technical team that they have a 50% probability of being late by one month, a 10% probability of being late by two months and a 5% probability of being late by three months. What is your risk exposure?
scheduled delivery is after 24 month and 3 month for beta testing ..(info if needed)
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
Dear Shailesh Wagh,
For simple and clear understanding of Project Risk Management in 20 minutes, please may view the YouTube video given in the below link
Regards,
R. Jagadeesan
This problem as presented is based on a single dominant chain. While it looks like both methods can give the same result it is not necessarily valid for the common case where more than a single chain occurs. In order to avoid the Flaw of Averages and falling into the Merge Bias issue it is better to use Monte Carlo methods.
Email: PPadmin@planningplanet.com
Replies